|
|||||||
|
4.6 Michel Foucault†Allen, Amy. 1998. Foucault’s debt to Hegel. Philosophy Today 42.1: 71-78. ----------. 2000. The anti-subjective hypothesis: Michel Foucault and the death of the subject. Philosophical Forum 31.2: 113-30. Auxier, Randall E. 2002. Foucault, Dewey, and the history of the present. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16.2: 75-102. Bevir, Mark. 1999. Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies 47: 345-59. Brigg, Morgan. 2002. Post-development, Foucault and the colonization metaphor. Third World Quarterly 23.3: 421-36. Campillo, Antonio. 2000. Foucault and Derrida: The history of a debate on history/ Angelaki 5.2: 113-35. †Chambers, Samuel A. 2001. Foucault’s evasive maneuvers: Nietzsche, interpretation, critique. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities 6.3: 101-23. Connolly, William E. 1993. Beyond good and evil: The ethical sensibility of Michel Foucault. Political Theory 21.3: 365-89. †Deacon, Roger. 2002. Truth, power and pedagogy: Michel Foucault on the rises of the disciplines. Educational Philosophy & Theory 34.4: 435-58. Dean, Carolyn J. 1994. The productive hypothesis: Foucault, gender, and the history of sexuality. History and Theory 33.3: 271-96. Fisher, Jacob S. 1999. What is an oeuvre? Foucault
and literature. Flynn, Thomas R. 1999. The philosopher-historian
as cartographer: Mapping history with Michel Foucault. Research in
Phenomenology Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998. Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society. British Hournal of Sociology. 49.2: 210-33. Fox, Nick J. 1998. Foucault, Foucauldians and sociology. British Journal of Sociology 49.3: 415-33. Freundlieb, Dieter. 1995. Foucault and the study of literature. Poetics Today 16.2: 301-44. Gearhart, Suzanne. 1997. The taming of Michel Foucault: New historicism, psychoanalysis, and the subversion of power. New Literary History 28.3: 457-80. †Gross, Daniel M. 2001. Foucault’s analogies, or how to be a historian of the present without being a presentist. Clio 31.1: 57-82. Gutting, Gary. 2002. Foucault’s philosophy of experience. Boundary 2 29.2: 69-85. †Hendricks, Christina. 2002. The author[’s] remains: Foucault and the demise of the “author functions.” Philosophy Today 46.2: 152-69. Huijer, Marli. 1999. The aesthetics of existence in the work of Michel Foucault. Philosophy & Social Criticism 25.2: 61-85. †Lynch, Richard A. 1998. Is power all there
is? Philosophy Today Marks, John. 1999. Certeau & Foucault: The other and pluralism. Paragraph 22.2: 118-32. †Marshall, James D. 2002. Michel Foucault: Liberation, freedom, education. Educational Philosophy & Theory 34.4: 413-18. Megill, Allan. 1987. The reception of Foucault by historians. Journal of the History of Ideas 48.1: 117-41. †Melville, Peter. 2002. Kant’s dinner party: Anthropology from a Foucauldian point of view. Mosaic 35.2: 93-109. †Mottier, Véronique. 2001. Foucault revisited: Recent assessments of the legacy. Acta Sociologica 44.4: 329-36. †Muckelbauer, John. 2000. On reading differently: Through Foucault’s resistance. College English 63.1: 71-94. Neubauer, John. 1999. Foucault’s voices. Configurations 7.2: 137-51. †Neve, Gordon. 1999. Foucault’s
subject: An ontological reading. Palmeri, Frank. 1999. History of narrative genres after Foucault. Configurations 7.2: 267-77. Pickett, Brent L. 2000. Foucaultian rights? Social Science Journal 37.3: 403-21. Plamper, Jan. 2002. Foucault’s Gulag. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 3.2: 255-80. Rajan, Tilottama. 2000. The masks of death: Foucault, Derrida, and the human sciences and literature. Angelaki 5.2: 211-21. Said, Edward W. 1972. Michel Foucault as an intellectual
imagination. Santini, Sylvano. 2002. Michel Foucault: Literature and the arts. SubStance 31.1: 77-84. Schrag, Francis. 1999. Why Foucault now? Journal of Curriculum Studies 31.4: 375-83. Schwartz, Thomas. 2000. Ancient frankness: Foucault’s aesthetics of existence and the question of free speech. Pretexts: Literary and Cultural Studies 9.1: 125-31. Seals, Greg. 1998. Objectively yours, Michel Foucault. Educational Theory 48: 59-66. Simons, Jon. 2000. Modernist misapprehensions of Foucault’s aesthetics. Cultural Values 4.1: 40-57. Sprinker, Michael. 1980. Textual politics: Foucault and Derrida. Boundary 2 8.3: 75-98. †Strenski, Ivan. 1998. Religion, power, and final Foucault. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 66.2: 345-67. Tamboukou, Maria. 1999. Writing genealogies: An exploration of Foucault’s strategies for doing research. Discourse 20.2: 201-17. Thiele, Leslie Paul. 1990. The agony of politics: The Nietzschean roots of Foucault’s thought. American Political Science Review 84.3: 907-25. Touey, Daniel. 1998. Foucault’s apology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 28.1: 83-106. Weberman, David. 2000. Are freedom and anti-humanism compatible? The case of Foucault and Butler. Constellations 7.2: 255-71. See also 1.2: Markley; 2.2: Foertsch; 3.1: Johnston; Miller; 3.2: Colebrook; 3.10: Kurasawa; 3.11: Hull; 3.14: Gracia; 4.9: Evans |
||||||
|