Presentation evaluation: The Fukuda Doctrine and the Koizumi Doctrine
Presenter(s): Yuko Fukata
Quantitative:
The first column is the category of evaluation, the second the instructor’s evaluation, the third the class average. The grade for the presentation is the total of column 2 or column 3, whichever is higher.
| citation (spoken) | 3.0 |
3.0 |
| citation (written) | 3.0 |
3.0 |
| use of primary sources | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| use of secondary sources | 2.5 |
2.7 |
| preparation | 3.0 |
2.8 |
| organization | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| development of ideas | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| use of visual / other aids | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| technique of presentation | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| response to questions | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| Total | 29.5 |
27.5 |
Number of evaluations: 3
Low grade: 26.0
High grade: 29.5
Median grade: 27.5
Recorded grade: A
Scale:
A (excellent ~ good) = 26~30; B (average) = 20~25,
C (below average) = 15~19, D (failure) = 14 and below.
Qualitative:
Comments are from students except in the rare case when the instructor has a comment to add to what students have said; the instructor’s comments if any will be in brackets and initialed.
What was most successful about the presentation?
This was a well-0constructed presentation; visual aids were effective; had a good delivery.
[From DE: Very nicely focused topic, confidently and effectively presented. ]
What could have been better about the presentation?
She might have emphasized her purpose more often.
 |
 |
 |
Read other evaluations
for this course
