Presentation evaluation: Economic Policy and Dynamic Effect
Presenter(s): Keiichiro Shimada
Quantitative:
The first column is the category of evaluation, the second the instructor’s evaluation, the third the class average. The grade for the presentation is the total of column 2 or column 3, whichever is higher.
| citation (spoken) | 1.0 |
1.0 |
| citation (written) | 2.5 |
2.5 |
| use of primary sources | 3.0 |
3.0 |
| use of secondary sources | 2.0 |
1.5 |
| preparation | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| organization | 3.0 |
2.3 |
| development of ideas | 2.5 |
2.5 |
| use of visual / other aids | 3.0 |
3.0 |
| technique of presentation | 3.0 |
2.7 |
| response to questions | 3.0 |
2.8 |
| Total | 26.0 |
24.0 |
Number of evaluations: 3
Low grade: 21.0
High grade: 26.0
Median grade: 24.0
Recorded grade: A-
Scale:
A (excellent ~ good) = 26~30; B (average) = 20~25,
C (below average) = 15~19, D (failure) = 14 and below.
Qualitative:
Comments are from students except in the rare case when the instructor has a comment to add to what students have said; the instructor’s comments if any will be in brackets and initialed.
What was most successful about the presentation?
His way of presenting was very interesting. He used the whiteboard effectively
He started the presentation by asking a question that caught the attention of the audience.
What could have been better about the presentation?
He did not cite anyone or anything during the presentation. He needed to cite something to support his thesis.
He should have composed the presentation more smoothly.
 |
 |
 |
Read other evaluations
for this course
